AND, THE LAW BREAKING OF LAHD, CONTINUES TO THIS DAY, AND ZUMA DOGG IS PREPARING A REPORT, BASED ON REAL PEOPLE'S STORIES TO TURN OVER TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES, WHICH I GUESS ISN'T CARMEN TRUTANICH:
AND TO HERB WESSON, ANTONIO VILLARAIOGSA & L.A. CITY COUNCIL: YOU KNOW THIS IS THE SINGLE MOST DEVASTATING COURT RULING AGAINST THE CITY, EVER! (Though ZD still likes to think his Venice Beach one was. BUT, he MUST digress to the #2 spot for this one!)
CARMEN A. TRUTANICH, City Attorney
200 N. Main Street, Room 916, City Hall East
Los Angeles, CA 90012-4131
Attorney for Defendants, City of Los Angeles and City of L.A. by and through L.A. Housing Dept.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
BARBARA DARWISH, Plaintiff
CASE NO. BC 398784
1. Pursuant to LAMC Section 151.05B (LAMC), Petitioner (Plaintiff) is entitled to writ of mandate because the City has a ministerial duty, under its Rent Stabilization Ordinance (RSO), to register or renew registration of Petitioner's four rental units on Petitioner's property, upon payment by Petitioner of the fees required to register four units and upon compliance with the requirements of LAMC Section 151.05B.
2. The requirement of registration under LAMC is a revenue measure, not a regulatory measure, the purpose of which i to fund the enforcement costs of the RSO by levying a tax or fee upon a landlord for each unit that the landlord wishes to rent.
3. The City does not authorize its Housing Dept (LAHD) to use the ministerial provisions of the RSO to force a landlord to comply with the City's building code. The building code is to be enforced by utilizing the enforcement provisions contained in that code.
4. LAMC has not been amended, remains in full force and effect, and still requires that the City issue to a landlord, upon the payment of proper fees and the furnishing of an emergency phone number, the registration of rental units.
5. The City cite no legislative enactment that permit City officers or employees to use the RSO to enforce building code. The building code itself has adequate enforcement provision for its enforcement. Nothing in this court's ruling deprives the City of its right to enforce its building code using the legislation enacted to enforce the code.
SUMMARY: Carmen Trutanich has been allowing the Los Angeles Housing Department to ILLEGALLY deny property owner registrations and renewals of their properties, for BUILDING & SAFETY CODE REASONS, when the court had to remind Mr. Trutanich, that the ONLY issue LAHD may concern themselves with is the fee itself. Adding that if the city wants to bust people on Building & Safety bullshit, they have to have the Building & Safety Department do that.
SO LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY CANDIDATE CARMEN TRUTANICH: WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN DOING, SINCE YOU BECAME L.A. CITY ATTORNEY, CLOWN?
MAKE THIS SHIT STOP, TO-FUCKING-DAY...CAUSE I'M TYPING UP THE REPORT WITH PEOPLE'S CASES AND FAXING IT TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES, TONIGHT! (YOU don't get a copy, CLOWN...YOU are an IMPROPER authority! LOL!)
HERE'S A LETTER FROM A PROPERTY OWNER WHO WAS BURNT BY THIS ILLEGAL CODE ENFORCEMENT: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/fr0f36
